A drinking age of 18 is not
equivalent to or rather doesn't equal alcoholism. There is however a
correlation actually some bit of psychology behind putting an age limit to
drinking. People desire the unattainable that is to say they tend to want what
they are told they cannot. Ironically the only thing that stands in the way young-in
(person under 21) trying to purchase liquor would be a piece of paper says that
they are too young. Picture a dam; behind it lies vast bodies of water, which
by the way is a lot of water. It's only natural that some of it escapes into
the atmosphere as vapor while others just may happen to get past the dam, but
the vast majority gets left behind. With all this built up pressure when the
dam is removed or opened, all those water molecules want to do is exactly what
they were prevented from doing for so long, that is flow without interruption.
Have I lost you? ... Good now what if said that one of those water molecules
actually represented one of you and the dam was actually THAT drinking age
limit. So my argument stands that lowering the age limit might reduce alcoholism
and binge drinking in college campuses like ours.

Well with all of this being said nothing is ever going to change, that
drinking limit will remain at 21 forever and of course 'young-ins' will always
argue for the limit to be lowered to 18. But you know what I've come to an
epiphany ... I doesn't matter what the age limit is anymore because I'm already
21
Posted
Sat, Oct 31 2009 4:36 PM
by
BUSeitu